He sees the Protestant way as a superior one one of Progress. I say that this only reflected the conditions of his period and the mutual confidence of individuals is more of a Hajnal line thing. Among Catholics, on the contrary, the basis of such a confidence cannot exist for in secular matters only force and voluntary subservience are the principles of action and the forms which are called Constitutions are in this case only a resort of necessity, and are no protection against mistrust.ġ02, Introduction, Geographical Basis of HistoryĪ bold statement in general. Hegel says it was only in Protestantism that type 1 developed.įrom the Protestant religion sprang the principle of the mutual confidence of individuals - trust in the honorable dispositions of other men for in the Protestant Church the entire life - its activity generally - is the field for what it deems religious works. Tl dr American motto ‘E pluribus unum’ (the unification drive) and its 1956 modern replacement ‘In God We Trust’ are an example of Hegelian thought - abstract centralized trust as opium for the masses. His beliefs didn’t scale to say the least… How not to trust it?! Stirner noticed these first and hated them. Institution is given a nice face AND many people signal commitment to it. This originated as a combination of type 1 with 0b. These operate by hyperstition, inclusive fitness or centralized spin-doctors. Type 2 - Abstract trust - trust in ‘spooks’, intangible things - institutions, God / Gnon falls here, as well as values. That is a deterritorialization of type 0, a tool evolved for one context gets hijacked into a novel one. Type 0b (subverted)- Tulpa - based trust - where you trust a smiling politician face on TV, or a savior figure in iconography. Different ideological tribes are often forks of trust network that used to be one. It is an extension of the type 0 via social proof. Gym code, dating market equilibria are all examples of this. Type 1 - social expectations towards 1-1 interactions - most animals will assume enmity, but those socialized expect and conform to expectations. All ‘unspoken understanding’ situations have this spirit. Two tribes barely speaking with each other can trade on this basis. It is highly focused on a specific individual and its strength rises with the intensity and length of knowing one another. Type 0 - ‘Smart social animal ‘ level’ - that’s how you can be affectionate with a cat, dog or a budgerigar parrot. Human source code for trust has many layers. What is trust? A set of relinquishing control behaviors and corresponding inner states that model positive Estimated Value to a choice where Other is given control (freedom to affect) your value function. Trust is part of our code, and interhuman trust hinges on the idea of know other people’s source code. Trust is built into us and we cling to it. We’re thrown into this world as babies, and we’re forced to trust our caretakers. Whom to trust? That is a fundamental question.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |